JANET EMIG WRITING AS A MODE OF LEARNING PDF
composing in an effort to lay groundwork for more detailed study of Janet Emig, “Writing as a Mode of Learning,” CCC, 28 (May, ). Emig, Janet. “Writing as a Mode of Learning.” CCC (May ) Emig, in this early article that articulates the importance of a. Emig thus points out the multiple reasons as to why writing is definitely a mode of learning. She uses a great deal of evidence from Vygotzky to.
||8 March 2008
|PDF File Size:
|ePub File Size:
||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
I thought I had finally found proof of what my parents thought was a very poor way of studying when I was in high school. First, she takes a strategic look at the four popular modes of communication used for learning: Create a free website or blog at WordPress.
Thus writing may be learnint by the need of expression or the need of getting an A in a composition class. To summarize her thesis, Emig feels that writing promotes learning uniquely because learnint as a product and as a process has many attributes that correspond uniquely to certain important learning strategies. I became particularly drawn by the idea that writing supports learning simply because of the fact that it reinforces its cycle through the use of the hand, the eyes, and the brainwhich is a very complex and intertwine process.
Writing as a mode of learning by Janet Emig: The necessity to establish a connection between all these processes requires of a series of skills that are guide writing as well; for instance the ability to coordinate, subordinate, superordinate, establish causal relations, and possibly narrate and describe She makes distinctions between writing and all other verbal language processes, writing janwt other forms of composing, and finally composition of writing in the two other major graphic symbol lewrning including mathematical equations and scientific formulas.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: I think those distinctions are a bit too rigid; does anyone else? I am not whining. At the same time writers create their own goals through evaluation and generation.
Writing as a Mode of Learning | Ethereal Education
February 10, at 3: Writing is uniquely adapted to the task of fostering insight and developing new knowledge. In the act of writing, people regenerate or recreate their own goals in the light of what they learn, and what they already know. Janet Emig idea that writing supports learning simply because of the fact that it reinforces its cycle through the use of the hand, the eyes, and the brain is true. The next part of the paper in my opinion was the most interesting.
Much of their burden of learning academic writing as a separate course can be lessen down. She starts out by using chemo-physiological definition of learning and then honing in on a more philosophical definition by John Dewey and Jean Piaget.
M on Response 29 — White…. Furthermore, Emig offers a nice list of differences between writing and talking.
Response #7 – Janet Emig’s “Writing as a Mode of Learning” | charityjoy
Home Rhetoric and Writing are Everywhere! Writing process is a set of individual thinking, and it is a goal directed thinking process that is set by writers. I wonder how man composition instructions and students think of writing that way. In this article Emig tries to show how writing serves as a unique way of learning. Emig uses these terms to tie together some consensus between these definitions to show what they all have in common. M on Response 21 — Elbow….
The intelligences like naturalistic, musical, logical are translated on papers in the writing process. I used to read my Social Study, Biology, or Literature books, synthesize, analyze, create diagrams, and in the process I would managed to re-write 3 pages of material into a page product. According to Jerome Brunner and Jean Piaget, people learn in three ways: You must be logged in to post a comment.
Writing as a Mode of Learning
I found the comparison between the learning strategies and attributes of writing process is actually interesting. Another distinction she makes is between skills that require origination and graphic representation and those that do not. It helps writers to stick to their main goals. You are commenting using your WordPress. Writin the next section of her paper she defines the many differences between writing and talking.
She feels that they serve separate and distinct functions and that janwt people do not realize this. You are commenting using your Twitter account. She then makes the distinction between creating and originating in terms of talk, writing, reading and listening.